BRUCHAS v. PREVENTIVE CARE, INC.

No. C6-96-602.

553 N.W.2d 440 (1996)

Mary BRUCHAS, Appellant, v. PREVENTIVE CARE, INC., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clair E. Schaff, Connor & Satre, L.L.P., Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Robert Cragg, Jeffrey W. Thone, Cragg & Fobbe, Hopkins, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., PARKER and HARTEN, JJ..


OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

This appeal is from a district court's decision granting JNOV in favor of respondent on appellant's claims for negligent retention and negligent supervision. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Preventive Care, Inc. (PCI), employed appellant Mary Bruchas as a telephone salesperson. In December 1993, appellant received a written notice warning her that her job performance was not satisfactory. PCI terminated appellant because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases