1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 947 F.Supp.
  5. 947 F.Supp. 43 (1996)
 

MORIARITY v. UNITED TECH. REP. EMP. RETIRE. PLAN

Civil No. 3:95cv2578 (PCD).

947 F.Supp. 43 (1996)

Michael MORIARITY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

November 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Farrell, Benefits Litigation Concepts, Marlborough, CT, for Plaintiff.

Theodore J. Tucci, Jean Elizabeth Tomasco, Robinson & Cole, Hartford, CT, for Defendant.

RULING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Moriarity, relying on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(a)(1)(B), 1132(a)(2), seeks a determination of his right to recover benefits allegedly due to him under Defendant United Technologies Corporation Represented Employees Retirement Plan ("Plan"). Plaintiff and Defendant filed cross-motions for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases