1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 926 F.Supp.
  5. 926 F.Supp. 63 (1996)
 

FREDERICK v. SOUTHEASTERN PA. TRANSP. AUTHORITY

Civil Action No. 95-1692.

926 F.Supp. 63 (1996)

Christopher FREDERICK v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 16, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lanier E. Williams, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

Nicholas J. Staffieri, SEPTA Legal Division, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Christopher Frederick, moves this Court to reconsider our Memorandum and Order of February 29, 1996, granting Defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority's (SEPTA) Motion for Summary Judgment. The purpose of a motion to reconsider is to "correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence," not to re-argue the issue. Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases