1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 236 Conn.
  5. 236 Conn. 746 (1996)
 

NASH v. WEED & DURYEA CO.

(15284)

236 Conn. 746 (1996)

RONALD NASH ET AL. v. THE WEED AND DURYEA COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released April 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce L. Elstein, with whom, on the brief, was Henry Elstein, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

Kenneth E. Lenz, for the appellee (named plaintiff).

Peters, C. J., and Callahan, Borden, Katz and Palmer, JS.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a prejudgment remedy in an action to recover unpaid commissions. The plaintiffs, Ronald Nash and Scalzo Realty, Inc., brought an action in several counts against the defendants, The Weed and Duryea Company, Peter G. Huidekoper, Jan E. Cohen and Arnold H. Foster, for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and tortious interference with the plaintiffs' rights to commissions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases