HILEMAN v. PITTSBURGH & LAKE ERIE R. CO.


546 Pa. 433 (1996)

685 A.2d 994

Thomas J. HILEMAN, Sr., v. The PITTSBURGH AND LAKE ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. CHEMED CORPORATION, a corporation v. SELLERS INJECTOR SYSTEMS, A DIVISION OF BROOKS PUMPS, INC., a corporation.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided November 26, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Katarincic, Kim M. Watterson, Richard M. Smith, Pittsburgh, for Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company.

Ralph G. Wellington, Philadelphia, for amicus curiae Association of American Railroads.

Paul L. Hammer, Pittsburgh, for Thomas J. Hileman, Sr.

Francis X. McTiernan, Pittsburgh, for Chemed Corporation.

Thomas Fallert, Pittsburgh, for Sellers Injector System.

Before FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, and NEWMAN, JJ.


OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We accepted this appeal to review the claim of The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (P & LE), defendant below, that the common pleas court committed reversible error at trial when it commented to the jury, and allowed plaintiff's counsel to do likewise, on the fact that the plaintiff did not receive workers' compensation benefits. Because we find that these remarks were wholly irrelevant to the issues at trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases