The record reflects that the matters raised in the instant lawsuit relate to two other cases that were settled and closed more than one year before the instant action was commenced. In view of the fact that the matters raised by appellants in the instant lawsuit are intrinsic, rather than extrinsic, the trial court was correct in entering its order of dismissal. See Cerniglia v. Cerniglia,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DIFILIPPO v. RAYLE
No. 95-1492.
669 So.2d 306 (1996)
Fernando J. DIFILIPPO, and Francesca G. Difilippo by and through Fernando Difilippo, Jr., their father and natural guardian, and Fernando Difilippo, Jr., Appellants, v. Wanda RAYLE, f/k/a Wanda Difilippo, and George C. Vogelsang, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 6, 1996.
March 6, 1996.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Donnal S. Mixon, Miami, for appellants.
Beth Tyler Vogelsang, Miami, for appellees.
Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GREEN, JJ.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
