Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court's order granting an extension of his placement is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, inasmuch as there was ample testimony demonstrating that his continued detention would protect the community and serve the best interests of the appellant (see, Family Ct Act § 350.3 [2]; § 352.2 [2]; Matter of Luis M.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.