BUTT v. CITY OF RICHMOND

Docket No. A070815.

44 Cal.App.4th 925 (1996)

52 Cal. Rptr.2d 232

THOMAS K. BUTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

April 24, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Leslie A. Levy for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Malcolm Hunter, City Attorney, and Everett Jenkins, Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.


[Opinion certified for partial publication1]

OPINION

HANING, J.

The petition of plaintiff and appellant Thomas K. Butt for writ of mandate seeking to order defendant and respondent City of Richmond to allow him to inspect itemized public records was denied. He appeals from that portion of the judgment ordering him to pay respondent's attorney fees and costs and imposing sanctions. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases