Claimant was employed as a maintenance worker assigned to work at a building owned by IBM, a customer of the employer's property management service. Claimant was discharged after it was discovered that he had taken a computer terminal from the office premises at IBM, concealing it in a storage area in violation of the employer's policy prohibiting the commingling of its assets with those of its clients. It was uncontested that claimant did not need a computer to perform his...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
