1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 917 F.Supp.
  5. 917 F.Supp. 51 (1996)
 

PAZ v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS

Civil A. No. 95-562.

917 F.Supp. 51 (1996)

Arnon PAZ and Hagar Paz, Plaintiffs, v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Montedonico, Montedonico, Hamilton & Altman, Washington, DC, and Michael Frank Barrett, Daniels, Saltz, Mangeluzzi & Barrett, Ltd., Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

Dwight D. Murray, Jordan, Coyne & Savits, Washington, DC, Robert Matthew Disch, Ross & Hardies, Washington, DC, John P. Penders, Bradley D. Remick, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Philadelphia, PA, and Douglas V. Wolfe, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Washington, DC, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for a judgment as a matter of law under Fed.R.Civ.P. 50. The standard for granting a motion for a directed verdict is the same as that applied when ruling on a motion for a judgment n.o.v. Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723, 726 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962, 99 S.Ct. 2407, 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979)). In both cases:

"Unless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases