CRAPO v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAH

No. 950718-CA.

922 P.2d 39 (1996)

Chad CRAPO, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH; Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc.; and ITT Hartford, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

August 15, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Black, Salt Lake City, for Petitioner.

Michael E. Dyer and Dori K. Petersen, Salt Lake City, for Respondents Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc. and ITT Hartford.

Alan Hennebold, Salt Lake City, for Respondent Industrial Commission of Utah.

Before DAVIS, Associate P.J., and JACKSON and WILKINS, JJ.


OPINION

DAVIS, Associate Presiding Judge:

Petitioner Chad Crapo challenges a Utah Industrial Commission Order affirming an administrative law judge's (ALJ) Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order denying him workers' compensation benefits pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 35-1-45 (1994). We affirm.

FACTS

Because Crapo failed to "marshal `all of the evidence supporting the [ALJ's] findings and show that despite the supporting facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases