KAY v. MARC GLASSMAN, INC.

No. 95-464.

76 Ohio St.3d 18 (1996)

KAY ET AL., APPELLEES, v. MARC GLASSMAN, INC., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weick, Gibson & Lowry, Paul A. Weick, Leslie S. Graske and David C. Weick, for appellees.

Schulman, Schulman & Meros Co., L.P.A., and Jack M. Schulman, for appellant.


FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., J.

In this case, we must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant's motion for relief from judgment. For the following reasons, we believe the motion should have been granted and consequently reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Appellant initially contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for relief from judgment without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. This issue was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases