ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. CHICAGO INS. CO.

No. 93-CA-00777-SCT.

676 So.2d 271 (1996)

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 20, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane V. Pradat, McCoy Wilkins Stephens & Tipton, Joseph L. McCoy, McCoy Wilkins Firm, Jackson, for Appellant.

William M. Gage, Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, John C. Henegan, Butler Snow, Jackson, for Appellee.

Before PRATHER, P.J., and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and MILLS, JJ.


MILLS, Justice, for the Court:

Today we are asked to construe two policies with conflicting "other insurance" clauses. In the court below, both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The sole issue was whether Allstate's coverage must first be exhausted before Chicago's coverage can be reached. After hearing the motions, the trial court granted summary judgment in Chicago's favor. The trial court held that: (1) Allstate is solely liable for the first $300,000...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases