1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 547 N.W.2d
  5. 547 N.W.2d 400 (1996)
 

CO. v. MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

No. C0-95-2027.

547 N.W.2d 400 (1996)

The 614 COMPANY, Appellant, v. The MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY and The City of Minneapolis, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 7, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger J. Magnuson, Michael J. Wahoske, Margaret M. Zverinova, Dorsey & Whitney, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for appellant.

James R. Dorsey, Marc D. Simpson, Steven P. Zabel, Gregory R. Fitzharris, Leonard, Street and Deinard, Minneapolis, for respondent Minneapolis Community Development Agency.

Michael T. Norton, James A. Moore, Office of the City Attorney, Minneapolis, for respondent City of Minneapolis.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and WILLIS and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

The 614 Company contends that its pleadings successfully state causes of action for (a) a temporary taking of its property by respondents, the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA), requiring compensation under both federal and state constitutions, (b) alternative relief premised on constitutional guarantees of both procedural and substantive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases