1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 554 N.W.2d
  5. 554 N.W.2d 384 (1996)
 

ALI v. CITY OF DETROIT

Docket Nos. 179412, 179556 and 180067.

554 N.W.2d 384 (1996)

218 Mich. App. 581

Mohammed ALI and Maria Ali, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Detroit Engineering Department and Detroit Transportation Department, Defendants-Appellants, and Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation a/k/a SMART, Defendant-Appellee, and County of Wayne and Wayne County Road Commission, Defendants, and City of Dearborn, Defendant-Appellee, and Ford Motor Co., Defendant. Mohammed ALI and Maria Ali, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Detroit Engineering Department, Detroit Transportation Department and Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation a/k/a SMART, Defendants-Appellees, and County of Wayne and Wayne County Road Commission, Defendants, and City of Dearborn, Defendant-Appellant, and Ford Motor Co., Defendant. Mohammed ALI and Maria Ali, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Detroit Engineering Department and Detroit Transportation Department, Defendants-Appellees, and Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation a/k/a SMART, Defendant-Appellant, and City of Dearborn, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided September 3, 1996, at 9:05 a.m.

Released for Publication October 15, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Fulkerson, Westland, for Mohammed and Maria Ali.

Linda D. Fegins, Principal Assistant Corporation Counsel, for City of Detroit.

Laurie M. Sabon, Dearborn, for City of Dearborn.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. by Jerome R. Watson, Irene Bruce Hathaway, and Brian K. Telfair, Detroit, for Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation.

Before MICHAEL J. KELLY, P.J., and HOOD and J.L. MARTLEW, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this negligence action, defendants City of Detroit and its departments (Docket No. 179412), Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) (Docket No. 180067), and City of Dearborn (Docket No. 179556) appeal by leave granted orders denying their respective motions for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) and (C)(10) pursuant to governmental immunity. These appeals have been consolidated. We affirm with respect to defendants City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases