SURERUS v. MATUSKA

Civ. No. 950423.

548 N.W.2d 384 (1996)

Tammy SURERUS, f/k/a Tammy Flaten, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Mark Thomas MATUSKA, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 29, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel E. Bertsch, Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, for Plaintiff and Appellee.

Mark Thomas Matuska, Fargo, pro se.


NEUMANN, Justice.

Mark Thomas Matuska appeals an order amending his child support obligation. We hold that an imprisoned obligor who has no other income on which to compute a child support obligation may be unemployed or underemployed for the purpose of imputing income under the child support guidelines. We reverse and remand.

Matuska and Tammy Surerus are the parents of a son, Christopher, born April 12, 1979. On April 14, 1982, Matuska was ordered to pay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases