Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the use of narcotics and controlled substances after urinalysis tests indicated that he had ingested marihuana. Petitioner challenges this determination, contending that it was not based upon substantial evidence. We disagree. Adduced in evidence at the disciplinary hearing were the misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officer who performed one of the two urinalysis tests and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
