Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant claims that the Family Court should have dismissed the proceeding because he was deprived of his right to a speedy dispositional hearing in violation of Family Court Act § 350.1.
The record evinces that a timely dispositional hearing was scheduled for January 4, 1995. However, on that date, the appellant's counsel requested, and was granted, an adjournment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.