HALL CONST. CO. v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY


295 N.J. Super. 629 (1996)

685 A.2d 983

HALL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND PRISMATIC DEVELOPMENT CORP., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 16, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Fleder argued the cause for appellant (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; Theodore W. Geiser and Mr. Fleder, of counsel; John F. Neary on the brief).

Robert T. Lawless argued the cause for respondent Hall Construction Co., Inc. (Hedinger & Lawless, attorneys; Mr. Lawless on the brief).

Lawrence P. Cohen appeared for respondent New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority (Courter, Kobert, Laufer & Cohen, attorneys; No brief was filed on behalf of this respondent).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, A.A. RODRIGUEZ and CUFF.


The opinion of this court was delivered by CUFF, J.A.D.

This appeal concerns the award of a contract by the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority (Sports Authority) for the general construction work to construct luxury spectator suites at Giants Stadium. Prismatic Development Corp. (Prismatic), the purported low bidder, appeals from an order entered by Judge Ciolino which declared its bid materially defective and invalid. Pending the outcome of this appeal, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases