1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 226 A.D.2d
  5. 226 A.D.2d 687 (1996)
 

MAYORGA v. REED-PRENTICE PACKAGING MACH. CO.

226 A.D.2d 687 (1996)

642 N.Y.S.2d 533

Miguel Mayorga et al., Respondents, v. Reed-Prentice Packaging Machinery Company et al., Defendants, and Creative Bath Products, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 29, 1996

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's papers were insufficient to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiffs' causes of action against it were precluded by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law (see generally, Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 553, 557-558; Abuso v Mack Trucks, 174...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases