1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 546 N.W.2d
  5. 546 N.W.2d 366 (1996)
 

CITY OF BISMARCK v. STUART

Criminal No. 950383.

546 N.W.2d 366 (1996)

CITY OF BISMARCK, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ronald E. STUART, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

April 23, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Fraase (argued), City Prosecutor, Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee.

Ronald E. Stuart (argued), Valley City, pro se for defendant and appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Stuart appeals from his conviction for driving while under suspension. Stuart argues that he has a constitutional right to operate an automobile on public roads without a driver's license. No court has ever held that it is an impermissible infringement upon a citizen's constitutional Right to Travel for the Legislature to decree that, unless exempted by statute, every person who operates a motor vehicle on public roads must have a valid operator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases