Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
While we agree with the plaintiff that the defendants should have been precluded from eliciting expert testimony regarding the plaintiff's alleged nonuse of the lap seat belt in the car in which she was a passenger (see, Siegfried v Siegfried,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.