1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 201 Wis.2d
  5. 201 Wis.2d 693 (1996)
 

STATE v. MOHR

No. 95-2186-CR.

201 Wis.2d 693 (1996)

549 N.W.2d 497

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lauri MOHR, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Mark D. Richards of Richards & Reisterer, S.C., of Racine.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Sharon Ruhly, assistant attorney general.

Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ.

BROWN, J.

Lauri Mohr claims that she should be allowed to withdraw her no contest plea to cocaine distribution charges. She primarily maintains that the trial court did not inquire into her knowledge of the presumptive minimum sentence and she therefore did not knowingly and voluntarily enter the plea. We reject the State's claim that the trial court was only required to inform her of the maximum sentence. We hold that Mohr has made a prima facie showing of an error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases