1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 683 So.2d
  5. 683 So.2d 208 (1996)
 

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF FLORIDA v. COMREAL MIAMI, INC.

No. 95-1230.

683 So.2d 208 (1996)

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. COMREAL MIAMI, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 27, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simmons, Hart & Sheehe and Karl Hart and Phillip Sheehe and Jeffrey P. Skates, Ocala, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Broad and Cassell and Paul Aiello, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After a jury verdict against Comreal, the trial judge granted it a new trial on the ground that he had erred in charging the jury. We reverse both because the alleged error was not properly preserved at trial, see Schorr v. Thaw, 464 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(preservation of objection to jury instruction applies to new trial order as well as appeal), pet. for review denied, 475 So.2d 696 (Fla.1985); 55 Fla...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases