At issue in this appeal is whether Supreme Court erred in imposing sanctions upon certain defendants for their deliberate dilatory conduct during discovery. We conclude that Supreme Court's award of sanctions should not be disturbed as it was not an improvident exercise of the court's discretionary authority under CPLR 3126, which is separate and distinct from the authority granted by 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see, Taub v Wulwick,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MAZARAKIS v. BRONXVILLE GLEN I ASS'N
229 A.D.2d 661 (1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 793
S. James Mazarakis et al., Constituting The Board of Managers of the Bronxville Glen I Condominium, Respondents, v. Bronxville Glen I Association et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 3, 1996
July 3, 1996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
