Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant contends that his inculpatory statements should have been suppressed because his right against self-incrimination was violated. The defendant's contention is unavailing since he made his inculpatory comments, which were not prompted, coerced, or coaxed from him after he was twice advised of his Miranda rights and after he waived his rights (see, People v Santiago,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.