PROGRESSIVE CAS. INS. CO. v. BRIGHTSTONE WATERPROOFING, INC.


295 N.J. Super. 581 (1996)

685 A.2d 959

PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BRIGHTSTONE WATERPROOFING, INC., AND AMERICO FERROLHO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 11, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LaTorraca & Christian, attorneys for appellants (Alex M. LaTorraca, on the brief).

Schechner & Decker, attorneys for respondent (Brian R. Lehrer, on the brief).

Before Judges KEEFE and LOFTUS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LOFTUS, J.A.D.

Americo Ferrolho, (Ferrolho) appeals from an order entered in favor of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (Progressive) dismissing the complaint in this insurance coverage case.

On appeal Ferrolho contends that: (1) he is insured under the Progressive policy; (2) the Brightstone vehicle is an uninsured motor vehicle under the policy, N.J.S.A.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases