Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the charges relating to his possession of controlled substances should have been tried separately from the charges relating to robbery and grand larceny. The evidence presented, including the defendant's admission at trial, demonstrate that his acts constituted a single criminal endeavor with the same purpose, and were closely related and connected in time and circumstance...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
