1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 683 So.2d
  5. 683 So.2d 192 (1996)
 

LANNING v. PEPSICO, INC.

No. 96-502.

683 So.2d 192 (1996)

Frank A. LANNING, Guardian Ad Litem of David M. Lanning, an Incompetent; and Ruth Lanning, Appellants, v. PEPSICO, INC., et al. Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haggard & Parks, P.A., Coral Gables; Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, P.A. and Joel S. Perwin, Miami, for appellants.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker and Alan Fiedel, Miami, and David N. Kittredge; Haddad, Josephs, Jack, Gaebe & Markarian and Lewis N. Jack, Jr., Coral Gables, for appellee PepsiCo, Inc.

Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We find that summary judgment was prematurely entered where the scant record to date indicates the existence of a genuine issue of fact as to whether there was an agency relationship based upon the dealings between the parties. E.g., Moore v. River Ranch, Inc., 642 So.2d 642, 643 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Braidi Trading Co. v. Anthony R. Abraham Enters., Inc., 469 So.2d 955

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases