1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 664 N.E.2d
  5. 664 N.E.2d 209 (1996)
 

PETERSON v. HINSDALE WOMEN'S CLINIC

No. 1-94-3345.

664 N.E.2d 209 (1996)

278 Ill. App.3d 1007

215 Ill.Dec. 812

Roy David PETERSON, as father and next friend, of Daniel Roy Peterson, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HINSDALE WOMEN'S CLINIC, a corporation, and Dr. Donald A. Amsler, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division.

March 29, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael W. Rathsack, Chicago (Louis S. Goldstein and Cindy G. Fluxgold, Chicago, of counsel), for appellant.

John V. Smith II, Chicago (Robert Marc Chemers and Anne Scheitlin, Chicago, of counsel), for appellees.

Justice TULLY delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Roy David Peterson (hereinafter Roy), as father and next friend of Daniel Roy Peterson (hereinafter Daniel), a minor, filed this action in the circuit court of Cook County against defendants Hinsdale Women's Clinic and Dr. Donald A. Amsler, seeking damages for extraordinary medical expenses that will be incurred in raising Daniel as a result of defendants' failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases