Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the court's charge on identification was inadequate because it failed to provide the jurors with detailed instructions to assist them in evaluating the accuracy of the sole complaining witness's identification of the defendant as the perpetrator (see, People v Martinez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.