PEOPLE v. LITWA


230 A.D.2d 638 (1996)

646 N.Y.S.2d 329

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alan Litwa, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

August 15, 1996


It must first be noted that defense counsel objected and informed the Judge that the deliberating and alternate jurors were communicating in the courtroom, and were, in fact, purportedly having conversations. As a result, the mandate of People v Agramonte (87 N.Y.2d 765) is satisfied and the issue is preserved. We do not read Agramonte, as the dissent does, to impose upon defendant an obligation to seek further relief in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases