RICHARDS v. MENDIVIL

No. 95-0228.

200 Wis.2d 665 (1996)

548 N.W.2d 85

Terry RICHARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Roger RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. Jairo MENDIVIL, M.D., Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 21, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of John J. Albert and Steven J. Watson of Albert, Jude, Boyd & Simanek, S.C. of Racine. Oral argument was by John J. Albert.

On behalf of the defendant-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief and oral argument of Jan M. Schroeder of Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C. of Milwaukee.

Before Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ.


ANDERSON, P.J.

In this appeal we conclude that leaving a portion of a nontherapeutic localization hook wire in Terry Richards's right breast is a situation where expert testimony as to the standard of care is not required. We reverse the trial court's order granting Dr. Jairo Mendivil's motions after verdict and dismissing the complaint because a layperson can reasonably infer that Mendivil failed to exercise proper care and skill during surgery when he left a foreign...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases