1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 103 F.3d
  5. 103 F.3d 762 (1996)
 

HILAO v. ESTATE OF MARCOS

Nos. 95-16487, 95-16145.

103 F.3d 762 (1996)

Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant, and Imelda R. Marcos; Ferdinand R. Marcos, Representatives of the Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B.J. Rothbaum, Jr., Linn & Helms, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for defendants-appellants.

Robert A. Swift, Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Imelda R. Marcos and Ferdinand R. Marcos, substituted under Rule 25 as representatives of the Defendant Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos ("the Appellants"), appeal from orders of the district court holding them in contempt. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This appeal arises out of post-judgment orders in a case involving nearly 10,000 class plaintiffs (referred to hereinafter collectively as "Hilao...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases