1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 22 Kan.
  5. 22 Kan. App.2d 64 (1996)
 

HARTFORD v. TANNER

No. 72,511.

22 Kan. App.2d 64 (1996)

910 P.2d 872

THE HARTFORD, Appellant, v. DONALD F. TANNER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Opinion filed February 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Switzer and Scott C. Long, of Payne & Jones, Chartered, of Overland Park, for appellant.

Lawrence L. Ferree, III, and G. Peter Bunn, III, of Ferree, Bunn & O'Grady, Chtd., of Overland Park, for appellee.

Before GERNON, P.J., MARQUARDT, J., and JAMES W. PADDOCK, District Judge Retired, assigned.

MARQUARDT, J.:

The Hartford (Hartford) seeks indemnification, as a surety, from Donald F. Tanner on two bond contracts Tanner signed as an indemnitor. After a trial to the district court, the district court ruled that Hartford's payments on the bonds were not reasonable and, therefore, Hartford was not entitled to indemnification from Tanner. Hartford appeals both the use of the "reasonableness" legal standard and the application of that standard.

Tanner and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases