1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 102 F.3d
  5. 102 F.3d 760 (1996)
 

U.S. v. DOBISH

No. 95-2183.

102 F.3d 760 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael DOBISH, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Debold (argued and briefed), Blondell Morey, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard M. Helfrick (argued), Stacey M. Studnicki (briefed), Federal Public Defenders Office, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; HIGGINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Dobish here appeals a 60-month prison sentence for mail fraud. Citing four alleged errors in the calculation of his guideline sentence range, Mr. Dobish contends that the district court erred in (1) making a "vulnerable victim" enhancement in the offense level; (2) enhancing the offense level for abuse of a position of trust; (3) "double counting" by using both of the foregoing enhancements; and (4) calculating the loss without allowing credit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases