PER CURIAM.
Carl D. Bond appeals his resentencing as an habitual offender for two counts of lewd acts in the presence of a child under 16 years of age. He raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that he was resentenced in derogation of this court's decision. Second, he argues that he should not have been resentenced as an habitual offender because the statute had been amended. We affirm in part and strike in part.
In Bond v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.