1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 682 A.2d
  5. 682 A.2d 173 (1996)
 

FRED EZRA CO. v. PEDAS

No. 95-CV-631.

682 A.2d 173 (1996)

The FRED EZRA COMPANY, Appellant, v. Theodore PEDAS et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided August 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Maginnis, with whom Mark A. Gilday was on the brief, Bethesda, MD, for appellant.

Jacob A. Stein, with whom Robert L. Bredhoff, and Nancy R. Grenier were on the brief, Washington, DC, for appellees.

Before SCHWELB, KING and RUIZ, Associate Judges.

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Appellant, The Fred Ezra Company, a licensed real estate broker, commenced this suit alleging that appellees, Square 74 Associates Limited Partnership through its general partners, owed appellant brokerage fees based on theories of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. Pursuant to Superior Court Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), appellees filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, claiming that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases