1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 546 N.W.2d
  5. 546 N.W.2d 306 (1996)
 

WICK BLDG. SYSTEMS v. EMPLOYERS INS.

No. C4-95-2192.

546 N.W.2d 306 (1996)

WICK BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, et al., Respondents, Donald J. Brown, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Hagstrom, Scott J. Ryskoski, Zelle & Larson, Minneapolis, for Respondents.

Thomas H. Boyd, Benjamin R. Mulcahy, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and PARKER and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant attorneys challenge the district court's ruling that they are not entitled to compensation under Minn. R. Civ. P. 45.06 for their time and expense in preparing for and giving testimony to produce documents in response to subpoenas duces tecum. We reverse.

FACTS

Appellants Lloyd Grooms and Donald Brown are attorneys. They represented Wick Building Systems, Inc. (Wick), in settlement negotiations on an insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases