NORTHLAND INS. v. CONTINENTAL WESTERN INS.

No. C0-96-210.

550 N.W.2d 298 (1996)

NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 25, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jarett B. Decker, Maun & Simon, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Michael E. McNee, Andrea E. Reisbord, Cousineau, McGuire & Anderson, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and RANDALL and SCHULTZ, JJ.


OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

The district court concluded that because the two insurance policies at issue could be applied consistently, it was unnecessary to look beyond the policies in order to determine which party was responsible for primary coverage. Appellant Continental Western Insurance Company challenges the district court's decision, arguing that even where "other insurance" clauses may be applied consistently, a court must still engage in a "total...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases