RED WING MOTEL INV. v. RED WING FIRE

No. CX-96-98.

552 N.W.2d 295 (1996)

RED WING MOTEL INVESTORS, Appellant, v. RED WING FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. GENERAL SPRINKLER CORPORATION, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Respondent, v. McCON COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 29, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick H. Elliott, Dunn & Elliott, P.A., St. Paul, for Appellant.

Lance B. Nyberg, Bren, Nyberg & Thompson, St. Louis Park, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, P.J., and DAVIES and HARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Motel appeals summary judgment dismissing its claims as time-barred under Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a) (1994). We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent General Sprinkler Corporation designed a sprinkler system for the Red Wing Quiet House Best Western Motel (Motel).1 It then bought parts and supplies and installed them. As a result of incorrectly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases