DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM.
Respondent, David G. Haynes, was formally charged with having been convicted of criminal offenses which constitute serious criminal conduct involving violation of Rules 1.15 and 8.4(a)(b) and (c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and which adversely reflected upon his moral fitness to practice law under La.S.Ct. Rule XIX, Sect. 19B. The facts of Haynes' criminal conviction show he was convicted by a jury of forgery...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
