COALITION TO SAVE OUR CHILDREN v. BD. OF EDUC.

No. 95-7452.

90 F.3d 752 (1996)

COALITION TO SAVE OUR CHILDREN, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the STATE OF DELAWARE; Board of Education of the Christiana School District; Board of Education of the Brandywine School District; Board of Education of the Colonial School District; Board of Education of the Red Clay School District; Delaware House of Representatives Committee on Desegregation.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided July 24, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. Barr, David Boies (argued), Sandra C. Goldstein, Katherine B. Forrest, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, Thomas J. Henderson (argued), Pace J. McConkie, Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, D.C., Leonard L. Williams, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.

Andre L. Dennis, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, PA, Mary B. Matterer, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Wilmington, DE, for Amicus Curiae — City of Wilmington, DE.

Rodman Ward, Jr. (argued), Andre G. Bouchard, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Wilmington, DE, John B. Hindman, Department of Justice, Dover, DE, for Appellee State Board of Education of the State of DE.

M. Duncan Grant, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, PA, Alfred J. D'Angelo, Jr., Daniel V. Folt, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Wilmington, DE, for Appellee Red Clay Consolidated School District.

David H. Williams, Barbara D. Crowell, Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, DE, for Appellees Brandywine, Christiana and Colonial School Districts.

Charles J. Cooper (argued), Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Delaware House of Representatives Committee on Desegregation.

Before: NYGAARD, SAROKIN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

  I. Introduction ...........................................................756
 II. Procedural History .....................................................757

 III. Scope of Review ............................................758
  IV. Unitary Status .............................................759
   V. Green...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases