GREENBERG v. GROSSMAN

No. 96-1.

683 So.2d 156 (1996)

Martin F. GREENBERG, Stanley H. Kuperstein and Karl M. Sachs, as the Majority in Interest of the General Partners and for the Use and Benefit of Kismet Apartments, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, Appellants, v. Harry GROSSMAN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied December 4, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger A. Bridges, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Keith, Mack, Lewis, Cohen & Lumpkin and Norman S. Segall and Jack R. Reiter, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Appellants Greenberg, et al., challenge a damage award in their favor in which the trial judge refused to award prejudgment interest. The appellee Grossman cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred in aggregating three separate compensatory damage counts. We find no merit in the cross-appeal, see Brod v. Adler, 570 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), review denied, 577 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1991); Phillips...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases