1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 683 A.2d
  5. 683 A.2d 156 (1996)
 

ANDERSON v. THOMAS

No. 95-CV-747.

683 A.2d 156 (1996)

Will ANDERSON, Appellant, v. Fred THOMAS, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 10, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Will Anderson, pro se.

Sidney R. Bixler, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Charles F.C. Ruff, Corporate Counsel, Robert R. Rigsby, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Rosalyn Calbert Groce, Chief, Criminal Appeals Section, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before SCHWELB and KING, Associate Judges, and NEWMAN, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Will Anderson challenges the dismissal of his complaint seeking an order compelling the Metropolitan Police Department ("MPD") to comply with his District of Columbia Freedom of Information Act ("DC-FOIA")1 request. Anderson contends that the court erred in ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain this action. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in dismissing on that ground and because the record is not sufficiently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases