MUSSELMAN v. CARROLL


289 N.J. Super. 549 (1996)

674 A.2d 612

WILLIAM MUSSELMAN AND CHANDRA RAMU, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. KAREN CARROLL, DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 12, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Hickey argued the cause for appellant.

Respondents William Musselman and Chandra Ramu argued the cause pro se.

Before Judges BAIME and VILLANUEVA.


The opinion of the court was delivered by VILLANUEVA, J.A.D. (retired and temporarily assigned on recall).

Defendant Karen Carroll appeals from the trial court's order dismissing her counterclaim for lost rent and ordering defendant to return plaintiffs' security deposit, minus certain charges for damages to the premises and a late fee.1 We reverse and remand for entry of judgment on the counterclaim in favor of defendant/counterclaimant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases