1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 227 A.D.2d
  5. 227 A.D.2d 606 (1996)
 

REEVES v. SCOPAZ

227 A.D.2d 606 (1996)

643 N.Y.S.2d 620

Laurie A. Reeves et al., Appellants, v. Erminia Scopaz, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 28, 1996

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant's motion for summary judgment was supported by evidence including the sworn statements of two physicians who had examined the plaintiff Laurie A. Reeves. One physician, a neurologist, concluded that Ms. Reeves had "no neurological disability of any kind". The other physician, an orthopedist, concluded that Ms. Reeves' condition was "unremarkable".

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases