1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 555 N.W.2d
  5. 555 N.W.2d 277 (1996)
 

WILLIS v. COUNTY OF SHERBURNE

Nos. C6-95-363, C5-95-371.

555 N.W.2d 277 (1996)

Galen WILLIS, Petitioner, Appellant (C6-95-363), Respondent (C5-95-371), v. The COUNTY OF SHERBURNE, Petitioner, Respondent (C6-95-363) Appellant (C5-95-371), Dan Nickols, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 31, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick E. Finch, John M. Buckley, Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for Willis.

Michael J. Ford, Kenneth H. Bayliss, Quinlivan, Sherwood, Spellacy & Tarvestad, P.A., St. Cloud, for Sherburne County.

Jeff M. Zalasky, Lauri A. Vranyes, Erstad & Riemer, P.A., Minneapolis, for Nickols.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

On the petition of plaintiff Galen Willis and conditional petition of defendant Sherburne County we review an unpublished decision of the court of appeals, Willis v. County of Sherburne, Nos. C6-95-363, C5-95-371, 1995 WL 479640 (Minn.App., Aug. 15, 1995). Following termination of his employment, Willis sued Sherburne County and Dan Nickols, alleging that the county had wrongfully discharged him, breached his employment contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases