1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 672 A.2d
  5. 672 A.2d 155 (1996)
 

HELINSKY v. C & P TELEPHONE CO.

No. 782, Sept. Term, 1995.

672 A.2d 155 (1996)

108 Md. App. 461

Mary P. HELINSKI v. C & P TELEPHONE COMPANY.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

March 1, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Stewart Barroll (Hoon & Barroll, on the brief), Chestertown, for Appellant.

William S. Tostanoski (Andrea J. Weisstuch on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellee.

Argued before WILNER, C.J., MOYLAN, J., and PAUL E. ALPERT, Judge (retired) Specially Assigned.

ALPERT, Judge.

Statutory construction and the attendant linguistical gymnastics that pertain to the timeliness of a claim of occupational disease under Maryland's Workers' Compensation Act ("Act") are the tasks presented to us by Mary P. Helinski, appellant, ("Ms. Helinski") and Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company, appellee, ("C & P") who were, respectively, employee and employer. Ms. Helinski, whose claim for workers' compensation was denied by the Workers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases