Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that the trial court's refusal to grant him an adjournment to secure the presence of four additional witnesses violated his constitutional right to compulsory process and constituted an abuse of discretion. The granting of an adjournment for any purpose is a matter of discretion for the trial court (see, People v Singleton,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.